Filter
Top Products
10
End-to-End IP Video Solution
Comparison – MPEG4 vs MJPEG
Comparison – MPEG4 vs MJPEG
MPEG4
• Stream of Inter-Framed Images (I,B,P
frames = Group Of Pictures)
• Easily Corruptible Video (Seconds-to-
Minutes) due to Dropped Network Packets
• Video Must Be Encoded From Source
and Decoded for Viewing
• Requires 3~4Mbps to Deliver Quality
Streams for Video Analysis & Surveillance
• Unable to Decode Multiple Streams due
to Heavy CPU Requirements
CONCLUSION:
Good for Broadcasting Application
(e.g. Internet) where Video Continuity
and Integrity are NOT Critical
MJPEG
• Continuous Stream of Independent and
Complete Video Images
• Data Integrity During Transmission and
on Storage Medium
• Video is Never Manipulated from
Source (No Encode/Decode Needed)
• Quality Video is Achieved at Lower
Bandwidths with Self-Contained Images
• Client Requires Minimum Processing
Power to View Multiple (e.g. 16) Streams
CONCLUSION:
Good for Security (e.g. Airport) where
Video Clarity, Integrity and Reliability
are EXTREMELY CRITICAL
End-to-End IP Video Solution
Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)
Enterprise Client Software (1 of 6)
Application
• ZView Software
• Windows 2000/XP-based Enterprise Client Software
• Alternative to Using Your Web Browser Only
Software License
• JVC Includes Unlimited User License for ZView Application with Each
VR-N100U
Usage
• Powerful Enterprise Management Tool
• Applicable for All Level of Users (Viewers, Operators, Administrators)
• Virtualization of All VR-N100U and Cameras From a Single Interface
• Supports Automatic Bridging of Subnets
• TAB Display Options are Fully Configurable to Better Match User Type